DDA to be expanded? Insurance

[Vincent]

news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/8556195.stm

Take a look at this people, the governments solution, compulsory insurance. The thing is perpetrators will surely not get the insurance, just like a number of wrongen's and dickhead drivers who dont have insurance. This will surely only go to restrict the good dog owners further. Just goes to show what a bunch of clueless cockwaffles we have running the country.

I also really like the bottom part that is asking for photos from people who have suffered dog attacks, thats extremely neutral.

[dog]

I've got no problem with this, if people don't get insurance then they'll get their dogs taken off of them. As I said before though the devil is in the details and at the moment, as it's a consultation there are no details.

There is a general election coming and we don't know what the result will be or where this consultation will go after that date. If this legislation is done right and is a replacement for the DDA then it would be brilliant, if it's additional and done badly then it could be very bad news...we just don't know at the moment.

[...Paul...]

people are also forgettin allection time is near an labour need votes. the cant even inforce everyone to have have car insurance an pay a congestion charge in london so how will they inforce pet insurance, also they cant even inforce the dda laws now on banned dogs too. its a scame by labour to make u vote for them.

allthough i have insurance for fergiie an getting soon for other 2.